Rural Employment, Rural consumerism, aam admi, National Advisory Committee ect have become buzz words after the NREGS (presently MGNREGS) scheme was conceived and implemented by UPA in the first term.
It was conceived as a medicine for dwindling income of rural people when compared to the rocketing rise in income of urban Indians. Unlike the salaried people whose salaries are linked to inflation rate (labour laws) and there is a commission to take care of their salary hikes and compensations, farmer’s income doesn’t have that guarantee in income increase. If we see the income in farming communities, the tomatoes and potatoes have the same price fluctuations (Rs.1 per kg to Rs.25 per kg or even greater) as it was years before. When everyone harvests the same vegetable, the gate price is almost like buying free of cost. Also, unlike in business scenario where people can always take care of their product price at least in terms of cost plus pricing, in case of farm produce this is not possible.
There are lots of problems in rural structure which are quite important to be tackled to improve the income levels of rural people. A quick and effective balm for this is providing them with guaranteed employment which the UPA has identified. As always with a medication there come its side effects. But here the side effect is not a minnow.
Because of the NREGS scheme crowding out the rural employment market during the time of agricultural activities, both small scale and large scale farmers are not getting enough farm workers for their activities. It happens in lot of places where during the initial plantation time or end harvest time the NREGS working days overlaps and the rural workers choose the NREGS work because the work is less demanding compared to farm work and the fear of losing the card if they don’t go to NREGS work. As a result famers find it difficult to get worker for their farm activities even though they are ready to offer more wages than NREGS wage (Rs. 100 per day). This leads to increase in cost for the farmers even though they don’t have power to pass on this cost to consumers.
The major issue is, because of this farmers have stopped or at least reduced their cultivation capacity. This has lead to heavy reduction in production of agricultural products in many areas especially where vegetables are produced. The recent rise in vegetable prices (basically due to supply constrains) is partly due to this issue.
One solution for this problem could be bring in a system where the local panjayaths can play a crucial role in allocating the rural workers to farm works and NREGS works. Local farmers can go and register their work force requirement in the local panjayaths. The Panjayath can allocate the required number of workers to different farmers (who have registered their requirement) based on first come first serve basis. The NREGS work can be taken up only when there is no farm works available to allocate.
This would beneficial in following ways:
1. It would resolve the labor problem faced by the farmers
2. It would increase the number of employment days the available for the rural workers.
3. Presently, NREGS provides employment in areas where generally good amount of farm or farm related employment is available. This results in deployment of this scheme where it is not required. By using the above said approach government can increase the efficiency of the scheme with much lower budget.
4. During the years of good monsoon, there are more farm works available and there will be more number of farm works which would reduce the number of NREGS work days effectively reducing the government expenditure.
Everything said, like any other scheme implementation holds the key. Hope government soon realizes the above said issue and bring in the necessary change.